Recoding of Court P...
 
Share:
Notifications
Clear all

Recoding of Court Proceedings

3 Posts
3 Users
2 Reactions
39 Views
Abhinav07
Posts: 7
Registered
Topic starter
(@abhinav07)
Active Member
Joined: 1 year ago

What are the legal and ethical implications of recording court proceedings without permission?

2 Replies
kavya
Posts: 10
Registered
(@kavya)
Eminent Member
Joined: 1 year ago

In the Indian context, recording court proceedings without permission carries significant legal and ethical implications:

Legal Implications

1. Contempt of Court: Unauthorized recording can be considered contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, as it disrupts the decorum and sanctity of judicial proceedings.

2. Right to Privacy: Recording proceedings may infringe on the privacy rights of individuals involved, as recognized under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution (Right to Life and Personal Liberty).

3. Violation of Procedural Laws: Courts in India operate under strict procedural laws, and unauthorized recording may breach these rules, leading to penalties or legal action.

4. Admissibility of Evidence: Any recording made without permission may not be admissible as evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, particularly if it violates Section 65B, which governs electronic records.

Ethical Implications

1. Breach of Confidentiality: Legal proceedings often involve sensitive information. Recording without consent undermines the confidentiality expected in such settings.

2.Erosion of Trust: Unauthorized recordings can damage the trust between legal professionals, clients, and the judiciary.

3. Professional Misconduct: For lawyers, such actions may amount to professional misconduct, violating the Bar Council of India's ethical guidelines.

recording court proceedings without permission in India is both legally and ethically problematic, potentially leading to penalties, loss of professional credibility, and harm to the judicial process. 

Reply
Mira
Posts: 8
 Mira
Registered
(@mira)
Active Member
Joined: 1 year ago

Contempt of Court
- Unauthorized recording of court proceedings is considered contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Section 12). Punishment includes imprisonment up to 6 months or a fine of ₹2,000.
Case Reference: In a Kerala High Court case, the court ruled that recording and circulating proceedings interferes with the administration of justice and lowers the dignity of the court
Copyright Violation
Court proceedings are protected under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (Section 51 and Section 63). Unauthorized recording or sharing amounts to copyright infringement, punishable by imprisonment or fines.
Case Reference: The Bombay High Court fined a Navi Mumbai resident ₹1 lakh for secretly recording court proceedings, emphasizing the sanctity of judicial processes
3. Information Technology Act, 2000
- Section 66D penalizes misuse of electronic means for wrongful gain.
- Section 67 prohibits the publication or transmission of sensitive content without authorization.

Supreme Court Guidelines
The Supreme Court's rules on live streaming and video conferencing explicitly prohibit unauthorized recording. Violations are punishable under the above-mentioned laws.

Ethical Implications

1. Breach of Confidentiality
- Legal proceedings often involve sensitive information. Unauthorized recording undermines the confidentiality expected in such settings.

2. Erosion of Trust
- Such actions damage the trust between legal professionals, clients, and the judiciary.

3. Professional Misconduct
- For lawyers, unauthorized recording may amount to professional misconduct, violating the Bar Council of India's ethical guidelines.

Relevant Case Laws

Bombay High Court Case
- A Navi Mumbai resident was fined ₹1 lakh for secretly recording court proceedings. The court emphasized the sanctity of judicial processes

Kerala High Court Case
- The court ruled that recording and circulating proceedings interferes with the administration of justice and violates court rules

3. Swapnil Tripathi v. Supreme Court of India:
- This landmark case allowed live streaming of certain court proceedings but imposed strict safeguards to protect privacy and prevent misuse

Rules and Guidelines

1. Model Rules for Live Streaming and Recording:
- Issued by the Supreme Court, these rules prohibit unauthorized recording and sharing of court proceedings.

2. Delhi High Court Rules, 2022:
- These rules specify that only authorized persons can record or share live-streamed proceedings. Violations are punishable under the Copyright Act and IT Act.

Unauthorized recording of court proceedings in India is a serious offense with strict legal and ethical consequences. Courts have consistently upheld the sanctity of judicial processes and imposed penalties for violations.

Reply